Your supplier can no longer support you
The original developer is hard to reach, the contract has ended, or the help available no longer meets your operational needs.
Your team still relies on the application. You need to know who can take over, what will be delivered and how issues will be followed up. SMERP helps you assess the system, verify the handover and establish a clear maintenance and support arrangement.
Free initial discussion. Technical assessment quoted before it starts. Scope and responsibilities agreed before ongoing support.
For businesses relying on an existing application, such as orders, approvals, membership or internal operations. These are common reasons to review the support arrangement.
The original developer is hard to reach, the contract has ended, or the help available no longer meets your operational needs.
Your team manages everyday IT, but application knowledge or code support depends on one person or an external supplier.
You need fixes, updates and environment changes to be assessed and checked against the business tasks that must keep working.
Unclear ownership can leave issues waiting and your team relying on manual workarounds. Establish who can support the application and what they need before the next interruption.
You need confidence that the next team can work with the system you have. We connect the business process, technical condition and handover requirements, then make the support scope and remaining gaps clear.
SMERP is a Hong Kong software company established in 2005, with experience in system delivery, integration, testing and ongoing support. We bring those disciplines together when assessing an existing application.
See our experience and team credentialsEach stage has an agreed scope, useful outputs and a clear point for deciding the next step.
Identify essential workflows, access, dependencies and technical risks. Establish whether ongoing support is a practical fit.
A current-state assessment, prioritised risks and a recommended support scope.
An informed decision about what to retain, address first and budget for.
Gather knowledge, check the agreed deployment and recovery procedures, and prioritise any work needed before support begins.
A handover checklist, support instructions and acceptance record covering verified capabilities and remaining gaps.
A clear starting point, with responsibilities and limitations understood.
Follow up incidents, control agreed changes and review service results. Keep system knowledge and improvement priorities current.
Issue and change records, service reviews and a prioritised improvement list.
Visible follow-through and a basis for reducing disruption and planning the next investment.
The proposal defines the checks, readiness conditions and acceptance arrangements. Missing access or code can limit the service offered; an untested procedure is recorded as unverified.
These outputs keep the service understandable and the knowledge available. Their detail, timing and acceptance criteria are set out in the proposal and agreement.
The application, key workflows, dependencies, known gaps and recommended next steps.
Value to your team: Understand the condition of the system and where attention is most useful.
The agreed support baseline, checked procedures, contacts, responsibilities and unresolved items.
Value to your team: Know what the support team has verified and how to ask for help.
Impact, owner, progress, next update and outcome; agreed changes include checks, approvals and deployment records.
Value to your team: Follow the work and understand what changed without repeatedly chasing for context.
Operational impact, service performance, outstanding risks, agreed effort usage and decisions needed.
Value to your team: See what the service contributes and plan the next action with evidence.
Illustration only: a fictional order-processing application. This is not a customer case study or actual performance data. Report content and frequency depend on the agreement.
An interrupted order-export workflow was restored. The business owner checked the output against an agreed sample.
A scheduled task failed. A new check and escalation instruction were recorded; the prevention action remains open until tested.
A retry fix was tested and approved before release. The deployment result and rollback procedure were recorded.
A software-version upgrade needs a separate assessment. The review identifies the risk, the proposed next step and the decision required.
The agreement names the covered applications, versions and environments, together with the activities, service hours and effort included.
Assess business impact, assign an owner and agree the next update. Confirm the operational result and record any remaining issue.
Investigate agreed faults. Check the effect of a fix, obtain approval and record the deployment and rollback arrangements.
Review applicable updates, security fixes and compatibility needs, with changes checked against agreed workflows.
Carry out agreed application checks and review recovery procedures, with backup and infrastructure responsibilities identified.
Keep the business context with the issue and coordinate the agreed actions with your IT team and relevant vendors.
Keep useful instructions and records current. Review results and prioritise preventive action after significant incidents.
Monitoring, database or server administration, backup operation, on-site work and out-of-hours cover are included only where explicitly agreed. Access, licences and third-party cooperation may be required.
Establish a baseline and agree a small set of useful measures. Each review connects the support work with operational impact and the next decision.
Review disruption to essential workflows and the time taken to restore their use. Confirm the business task and relevant records work as agreed.
Review response, progress updates, repeat issues and preventive actions. Your team knows what is resolved and what still needs attention.
Review included effort, outstanding risks and proposed additional work. Prioritise spending before approving the next activity.
Measures, data sources and reporting frequency are agreed for the system. Missing data is identified; an improvement is reported only when the available evidence supports it.
The initial discussion is free. A deeper technical assessment has an agreed scope, deliverables and quotation before it starts.
Knowledge transfer, verification, documentation and initial remediation are scoped and quoted for the assessed system.
The annual agreement defines covered work, hours, effort or usage limits, priorities, reporting and fees. Additional work is approved separately.
New functions, major upgrades and work outside the agreed baseline are assessed and quoted separately. Each proposal identifies deliverables, timing and how completion will be confirmed.
Response and recovery targets are agreed after assessment and stated separately in the contract. This service does not automatically include the recovery commitments of a separate SMERP product or hosting agreement.
We assess the technology, access, documentation, source code rights and dependencies first. The proposal identifies the work we can accept and any readiness conditions.
Tell us what access and supplier arrangements are available. Some operational or coordination support may be possible, while code changes can be restricted. We explain the feasible scope after assessment.
The agreed handover record identifies the support baseline, responsibilities, contacts, instructions, verification results and remaining gaps. The proposal defines the deliverables and acceptance criteria.
Support hours, escalation, response targets and recovery arrangements depend on the assessed system and contract. Out-of-hours or on-site requirements are reviewed and quoted before an offer is made.
Agree the baseline, useful measures and review schedule with us. Reviews cover operational impact, service progress, risk actions and effort usage, with evidence and any data limitations made clear.
The agreement defines included maintenance and fixes. New functions, major upgrades and other additional work are assessed and quoted separately before they start.
Tell us what must keep working and where support is falling short. We will discuss whether an assessment and a structured handover are a practical fit for your application.
connect@smerp.hk